Finance and economics | Tariff Man Part Two

Donald Trump’s second term would be a protectionist nightmare

His first term was bad enough

Collage featuring a prominent portrayal of Donald Trump's face. In the background, various elements like shipping containers, steel materials, and aluminum components.
Image: Anthony Gerace
|Washington, DC

Sequels are never as good as the original. And when the original was terrible, there is even more reason to dread the next episode. So it is with “Tariff Man Part Two”. In the White House, Donald Trump put more new tariffs on American imports than any president in nearly a century. His philosophy was simple: “I am a Tariff Man. When people or countries come in to raid the great wealth of our Nation, I want them to pay for the privilege of doing so.”

Mr Trump’s protectionism made America poorer, did little to help exporters and annoyed its friends. If he wins the Republican presidential nomination (a likely outcome) and goes on to win the election (too close to call), he has vowed to ramp up things. He is mulling an across-the-board levy of perhaps 10% on all products entering America. In one fell swoop, his plans would more than triple the average American tariff. The direct costs would be bad enough, with the tariffs functioning as a tax on consumers and hurting most producers. Yet they would also tear at America’s ties with its allies and threaten to wreck the global trade system.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Tariff Man Part Two, a tragedy"

Too good to be true: The contradiction at the heart of the world economy

From the November 4th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance and economics

At long last, Europe’s economy is starting to grow

Now for the hard part

The property firm that could break China’s back

If Vanke collapses, so might confidence in the state’s management of the economy


Narendra Modi’s flagship growth scheme is off to a sluggish start

Without improvements, it risks wasting trillions of rupees