Business | Grid unlock

Can Europe’s power grid cope with the green transition?

The boss of Germany’s biggest grid operator sure hopes so

High-voltage electricity power lines in Germany.
Image: Getty Images
|BERLIN

“More Energiewende, more business for us,” says Leonhard Birnbaum, chief executive of E.ON, a German power-grid operator that enjoys a near monopoly in Europe’s biggest economy. The set of policies and timetables to which he is referring (and which translates to “energy turning-point”) was first unveiled in 2000 with the aim of making Germany a net-zero emitter of carbon by 2045. It is meant to increase the demand for and the supply of green power exponentially. And it can only work so long as that power can reliably flow from wind and solar farms to users in Germany and the rest of Europe.

This presents an enormous opportunity for E.ON—and an equally formidable challenge. The energy transition requires huge investments in German and European grids, and it requires them right now. That will only happen if the government and regulators fundamentally change the way they deal with power-grid projects, notably by cutting red tape and speeding up permitting for grid expansion and reinforcement. “The limits of infrastructure are the biggest obstacle of Europe’s green transition,” says Mr Birnbaum. At the moment, he explains, the grid expansion can barely cope with the huge surge of producers of renewable energy trying to connect to it.

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "Grid unlock"

Living to 120: A special report on how to slow ageing

From the September 30th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Business

Can Nvidia be dethroned? Meet the startups vying for its crown

A new generation of AI chips is on the way

What do Joe Biden and the boss of Starbucks have in common?

Both are grappling with gloomy consumers at home and trouble abroad


How not to name a new car

Companies that get it wrong risk both derision and outrage