Business | Picking losers

Why America’s controls on sales of AI tech to China are so leaky

For increasingly hawkish lawmakers, that’s a problem

Illustration: Mike Haddad

GINA RAIMONDO seemed frustrated when she took the stage at the Reagan National Defence Forum in California in December. The Department of Commerce, which she leads, had just tightened restrictions on the sale of American semiconductors to China. But Nvidia, the world’s most valuable chipmaker, had immediately started developing a new, slightly less powerful artificial-intelligence (AI) chip for the Chinese market, to which the restrictions would not apply. “If you redesign a chip…that enables [China] to do AI, I’m going to control it the very next day,” Ms Raimondo warned.

That was bombastic, given that it had taken her department a full year to rework the restrictions to cut off Nvidia’s previous workaround. Nevertheless, America’s five-year campaign against Chinese technology is intensifying. Earlier this month it was reported that Jensen Huang, Nvidia’s chief executive, and two fellow chip bosses had been summoned to testify in Congress about their Chinese business. On January 19th ABB, a Swiss industrial group, revealed that American lawmakers were investigating its links with China. ABB said it was co-operating with the investigation; Nvidia has said that it is working closely with the government to ensure compliance with the export controls.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "Picking losers"

How the border could cost Biden the election

From the January 27th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Business

Can Nvidia be dethroned? Meet the startups vying for its crown

A new generation of AI chips is on the way

What do Joe Biden and the boss of Starbucks have in common?

Both are grappling with gloomy consumers at home and trouble abroad


How not to name a new car

Companies that get it wrong risk both derision and outrage